It's True(?)
From what I can tell, Rafael Soriano really has been traded for Horacio Ramirez.
This is the worst trade the Mariners have made in a long, long time.
More on this later when I'm able to pull myself out of a pool of my own tears.
Update: As of 6:11pm EDT, there's still an air of uncertainty surrounding this deal. Half an hour ago it sounded all but done, but now the M's are denying it, soooooo...
9:04pm update: Bad news, everyone.
9:24pm update: I officially have no idea what's going on anymore, and I really don't give a crap. Something either needs to happen or not happen so we can be done with it and move on.
0 recs |
128
comments
Comments
Fuck this
by Matthew on Dec 6, 2006 2:05 PM PST 0 recs
I hope
by Graham on
Dec 6, 2006 2:06 PM PST
up
0 recs
Bill Bavasi must die...
by basebliman on Dec 6, 2006 2:06 PM PST 0 recs
Oh fuck.
by Goose on Dec 6, 2006 2:06 PM PST 0 recs
I hereby announce my boycott
I had such wonderful plans for my 21st birthday party, too.
by Graham on Dec 6, 2006 2:07 PM PST 0 recs
I'll join you for your 21st
by Scruffy Lefty on
Dec 6, 2006 2:13 PM PST
up
0 recs
What bullshit....the same mentality
by Dollar97 on Dec 6, 2006 2:09 PM PST 0 recs
Did we at least get some
by Dollar97 on
Dec 6, 2006 2:10 PM PST
up
0 recs
yeah
by Trenchtown2 on
Dec 6, 2006 2:50 PM PST
up
0 recs
OK, let's chill out.
by I'm NOT Corco on Dec 6, 2006 2:11 PM PST 0 recs
Nope, LaRoche is being delt to the Pirates for
We got outsmarted by the fucking Pirates.
by Goose on
Dec 6, 2006 2:12 PM PST
up
0 recs
Well
They reportedly have a pending deal worked out, just waiting on the health report on Mike Gonzalez.
by MfaninAlaska on
Dec 6, 2006 2:14 PM PST
up
0 recs
Bavasi just dealt Soriano
by OlyOle on Dec 6, 2006 2:11 PM PST 0 recs
Just. Wow.
by PositivePaul on Dec 6, 2006 2:11 PM PST 0 recs
I'm shocked.
--Stewie Griffin AND Josh Beckett
by Phildopip on Dec 6, 2006 2:12 PM PST 0 recs
I can't believe this
by Trent on Dec 6, 2006 2:12 PM PST 0 recs
Funny or #$@#)*NWED UP
by Jed C on Dec 6, 2006 2:13 PM PST 0 recs
my ass hurts
by Scruffy Lefty on Dec 6, 2006 2:16 PM PST 0 recs
Get a Frickin' Rope....
by Dollar97 on Dec 6, 2006 2:16 PM PST 0 recs
I don't get it
by BrianV on Dec 6, 2006 2:16 PM PST 0 recs
Time to be the contrarian here.
As outcomes go, that's not too bad. I see no reason to prefer any one of the Meche/Lilly/Eaton/Padilla/Batista Axis of Overpaid Crap to Ramirez, and Soriano is probably the premium you have to pay to get him.
by eponymous coward on Dec 6, 2006 2:18 PM PST 0 recs
Gee, if only the M's had thought of that.
This team needs starting depth, and if it's this or signings off the FA market, this is an easy decision for me. If we're going to whiff on Schmidt, Matsuzaka or Zito, options based around LOW cost options in the rotation that don't involve long-term contracts are infinitely preferable, in my opinion. Soriano, unfortunately, is the price to get one of those.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 2:27 PM PST
up
0 recs
Ramirez is taking Thomson's place.
by Jeff on
Dec 6, 2006 2:33 PM PST
up
0 recs
I'm not convinced of that.
That being the case, Soriano for Ramirez to fill out the rotation is understandable.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 2:37 PM PST
up
0 recs
If you don't land a big name
by sergey on
Dec 6, 2006 2:41 PM PST
up
0 recs
This offseason
They got their cheap starter. Now hold on to your hats, because the ride's just beginning.
by Jeff on
Dec 6, 2006 2:43 PM PST
up
0 recs
Not sure of that.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 2:50 PM PST
up
0 recs
I think buying out arb years of Lopez et al...
by basebliman on
Dec 6, 2006 2:53 PM PST
up
0 recs
Ok.
If trade stands as is, we as fans and M's roster suffered a major loss!
by sergey on
Dec 6, 2006 2:34 PM PST
up
0 recs
You might want to wait for my anger to simmer
by chaney on
Dec 6, 2006 2:20 PM PST
up
0 recs
Mike Gonzalez gets Adam LaRoche.
There's no way this is good for us.
by Jeff on
Dec 6, 2006 2:21 PM PST
up
0 recs
Comparing him to Washburn
by JLC on
Dec 6, 2006 2:27 PM PST
up
0 recs
Washburn's fine at a decent salary.
Sorry. Still not convinced this is the OH NOES everyone thinks it is.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 2:35 PM PST
up
0 recs
No, YOU shut up. No backs.
We're talking about a very good RH reliever with a bad injury history vs. a LH 4-5 starter with not so bad an injury history.
ideally, yes, you'd like to swap Sexson, Mateo and Reed for LaRoche and Hudson, but it ain't happening.
Here's a little exercise. If I have a replacement level starter (5.5 runs/9 IP) throwing 180 innings and Soriano throwing 60 IP (3.0 runs/9/IP), that comes out to 130 runs. If I have a starter giving up runs at 4.8 runs/9 IP over 180 innings (Ramirez has been around a 4.7-4.8 xFIP the last 3 years), and a reliever giving up 4.5 runs per 9/IP (basically, replacement level), I net 126.
Yes, I know, high leverage innings, blah blah blah. I'm still not seeing the OMGWTFBBQ!!111 trainwreck.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 3:26 PM PST
up
0 recs
No need for stats
Rafael Soriano is a very good reliever. He is a valuable commodity.
Horacio Ramirez is a #5 starter. He is not good. Of the things that a pitcher has a lot of control over (K's, HRs, BBs, GB%, staying healthy) he is sorta good at one (keeping the ball on the ground, inconsistent at one (HRs), and horrible at the other three. The guy is not good.
Guys like Soriano are tough to get. They are valuable. Guys like Ramirez aren't. That is basically what it comes down to.
I wouldn't mind if we picked him up for nearly nothing (Broussard?). But if he is going to cost you a good player, just sign John Thompson. Thompson is better, he will also be cheap, and he won't cost us a premium reliever.
You can try to convince yourself that this deal is not a debacle all you want. But if the M's do this trade, it will be a trainwreck.
Seriously, you are basically telling a guy who just stepped in dog shit that the crap on his shoe could be a good thing. Its not.
by Jerry on
Dec 6, 2006 3:43 PM PST
up
0 recs
Why are Ramirez and Thomson exclusive?
I also think you underestimate the number of guys who can go from being marginal minor league starters to effective relievers. Just in our system, Mateo was actually a pretty good reliever before his arm blew out in 2004 and he lost his good 94-96 stuff; Putz went from nothing to OMGHE'STEHAWESOME. Even Matt Freakin' Thornton has posted decent ERAs in 2 of his 3 years in the bigs, and he's just not that good.
Square by Brendan Donnelly, Ben Weber, Scot Shields, Chad Bradford and so on... and really, it's just Not That Hard to find good relief help. I won't be surprised at all if by this time next year Emiliano Fruto, Travis Chick or Yorman Bazardo is our next RHP relief stud.
Would I complain about Soriano/Sexson for Hudson/LaRoche? Not in the slightest. But I'm not as high on Soriano as other people are.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 4:13 PM PST
up
0 recs
100% totally irrelevant
But that is not what is important.
If Bavasi makes this deal, he will be trading something with a high market value for something with a low market value.
You can argue all you want about whether or not that market value is valid or not.
But when you have a commodity that everyone else wants, you don't give it away for something that is easly acquired.
Its a bad trade. Everyone on earth realizes this but you.
by Jerry on
Dec 6, 2006 4:18 PM PST
up
0 recs
Market value, huh?
If y'all can show me one aside from Thomson we can pick up for a cheap contract or spare parts like Mateo, Reed, Broussard and so on, great.
I think you overestimate the value of a guy with bad injury history who's pitched zero MLB innings since getting a shot to the head has.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 4:46 PM PST
up
0 recs
Whatever
Everyone else does too.
Seriously, go read any message board out there that has commentary on this proposed trade.
Rotoworld. USSM. This site. mlbtraderumors.com. Braves blogs.
I don't remember a trade that has been so universally shunned. Seriously. There is very broad consensus that this trade would be a horrible decision for the M's.
If Bavasi makes this deal, everyone will be calling for his head. Everyone but you, apparently.
by Jerry on
Dec 6, 2006 5:00 PM PST
up
0 recs
I don't want to moderate or anything
EC is right that Ramirez has some value in this market. Healthy, he's a 30+ start guy capable of giving you an ERA in the 4.50-4.75 range. It's just that Soriano's value is way higher, and should net something substantially better than a #4/5 starting pitcher.
by Jeff on
Dec 6, 2006 5:06 PM PST
up
0 recs
Sorry
EC is not the enemy.
Bill Bavasi is.
by Jerry on
Dec 6, 2006 8:17 PM PST
up
0 recs
I am trying to be a contrarian as well...
We just traded one of the best middle relievers in the game for Horacio Ramirez.
Eeesh
by tait644 on
Dec 6, 2006 2:31 PM PST
up
0 recs
Rotoworld reports
I don't know...I'm reaching - but it seems odd for the Braves to acquire Williams and Soriano in the same hour.
by OlyOle on Dec 6, 2006 2:21 PM PST 0 recs
Why?
Getting Gonzalez makes MUCH more sense - he's very, very good and now gives the Braves a SICK bullpen.
BTW - I think it is funny that so many of us thought Bavasi was going to outsmart Scheurholz.
This deal reeks of desparation after the Schmidt signing...
by tait644 on
Dec 6, 2006 2:27 PM PST
up
0 recs
Bavasi didn't just get outsmarted by Scheurholz
He's done. If this is true, he doesn't deserve the job. I've given him so much credit and all he does is continue to ruin the club. Unreal.
by Trent on
Dec 6, 2006 2:29 PM PST
up
0 recs
I'm all for hope right now
by eknpdx on Dec 6, 2006 2:22 PM PST 0 recs
Don't fool yourself
by ajpprc on
Dec 6, 2006 2:31 PM PST
up
0 recs
Sooooo....
Scruffy?
by PositivePaul on Dec 6, 2006 2:23 PM PST 0 recs
When he removes his dick from my ass
by Scruffy Lefty on
Dec 6, 2006 2:33 PM PST
up
0 recs
Which is worse?
by tkballer22 on Dec 6, 2006 2:29 PM PST 0 recs
Heathcliff, easily.
by chaney on
Dec 6, 2006 2:32 PM PST
up
0 recs
Slocumb was still worse...
by basebliman on
Dec 6, 2006 2:36 PM PST
up
0 recs
I don't think he got us there
I'm going to go take a shower now and then I'm going to blow up America. I might blow up Canada too if I'm still mad. Take shelter.
by chaney on
Dec 6, 2006 2:43 PM PST
up
0 recs
Now it's settled in..
And now, I'm just kind of sad. I feel defeated. I feel sick. i just want to cry right now.
by I'm NOT Corco on Dec 6, 2006 2:30 PM PST 0 recs
Almost there -
Anger - you dumb @)#$&@$23!! Bavasi is TeH SUKKIESSSST!!!
Fear - sweet merciful crap, Fire Bavasi before he trades Felix for Soriano (potential closer for young SP).
Bargaining - call M's FO. If you fire Bavasi, Lincoln, Armstrong, and Grover I'll buy 20 season tickets - I promise - I have cash!
Acceptance - well, the M's weren't going to win in 07. Might as well make it more likely we'll have a new front office after a 4th straight year in the cellar.
by Jed C on
Dec 6, 2006 2:42 PM PST
up
0 recs
Three things
- If you've got your auto-refresh USSM program running, please stop. We don't particularly enjoy going down every time the Mariners make a move.
- Ramirez is better than everyone is giving him credit for. Lefty groundball guys can't succeed without strikeouts.
- This trade still sucks. They should have gotten much more.
by davidcameron on Dec 6, 2006 2:35 PM PST 0 recs
Can or Can't succeed without strikeouts?
by Scruffy Lefty on
Dec 6, 2006 2:36 PM PST
up
0 recs
My guess is...
Felix
Washburn
Thomson
????
Baek/Woods/Feierabend/etc.
I think the team has lost out on Schmidt and is going to punt on Zito getting a zillion dollars on a 5 or 6 year deal, as well they should, and also correctly realizes that everyone else in the market is a ticking time bomb of mediocrity at severe risk of being overpaid. As such, they should be assembling low-cost, low-commitment viable starting options. Ramirez counts as one.
It sucks that the price was this high, and in an ideal world Soriano would be one of those low-cost options. I suspect the M's don't think he's viable for that role, though. I think the M's may have overpaid some now to KNOW they've got a spot locked up before spring training, which is certainly an arguable point (I'm not as high on Soriano as other people are), but this isn't Slocumb for Varitek and Lowe, either.
by eponymous coward on
Dec 6, 2006 2:46 PM PST
up
0 recs
Re: Thing #1
There are so many levels of metaphoric significance there. Beautiful.
by Hoft on
Dec 6, 2006 2:47 PM PST
up
0 recs
Ha Ha
by I'm NOT Corco on
Dec 6, 2006 2:50 PM PST
up
0 recs
This sucks
I hope the M's medical staff knows something we don't about Soriano, or this is going to piss me off!
by Thingray on Dec 6, 2006 2:42 PM PST 0 recs
Soriano's fine.
by Jeff on
Dec 6, 2006 2:44 PM PST
up
0 recs
There is some hope....
by Dollar97 on Dec 6, 2006 2:43 PM PST 0 recs
were was the hope in that?
by Scruffy Lefty on
Dec 6, 2006 2:48 PM PST
up
0 recs
Schmidt is better than what we've had
Was this dumb? Yes. Fiscally prudent? Yes. Dictated by a front office wanting to not spend a fortune on pitching, YES.
by Dollar97 on
Dec 6, 2006 2:52 PM PST
up
0 recs
Ummm
If you want to go cheap, don't give up good players for the right to do so.
by Josh on
Dec 6, 2006 2:56 PM PST
up
0 recs
Not necessarily
by G_ on
Dec 6, 2006 3:01 PM PST
up
0 recs
Wait a minute
Of course that doesn't justify getting hosed on this deal, you should have been able to pick up someone like Ramirez for a lot less than Soriano.
On the other hand losing a player like Soriano and picking up a fungible part doesn


